Taxation with Misrepresentation

This page contains the correspondence of Jean-Paul Tertocha with his Senators and Representative, and their replies.

Letter to:  Mark Kirk, Aaron Shock, Richard Durbin
Sent:

4/8/2011

  First off, I want you to be informed who this constituent is.  I am the son of a WWII Veteran.  My Father was drafted, and sent to Europe and missed his High School graduation ceremony.  His Mother accepted his diploma for him.  My Mother, who met my father during the war, immigrated to the United States.  She did so to escape the Fascism and other negative aspects of Europe at the time.  She WANTED her children to be Americans.  I am a staunch patriot, and learned that from BOTH parents.  I am proud of this, and will not budge on my stance!

   Following are some issues that involve the United States of America, that as a Citizen, I find intolerable.

 

1. Gasoline prices!  As I see the price rise on a DAILY basis I wonder how stupid, and/or gutless the average American politician is.  Over forty years ago, I was taught in business and economic class' that a person should diversify their portfolio.  In other words, don't put all your eggs in one basket.  I learned this throughout high school.  I learned this in college as well in business class'.   So what have our idiot politicians and presidents done the last forty years?  Allow the country to become dependent on one energy source, petroleum.  And then to add insult to injury, allow one organization, OPEC, to manipulate the supplies of oil in an unrealistic manner.  Plus, OPEC is dominated by individuals that hate the Western culture.  Don't believe me?  Here is what Osama Bin Laden said a few years ago; " We are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy.  Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah". And thanks to the gutless, weasel, traitors at the Federal level in our country, this is happening.  Oil prices have NOTHING to do with supply and demand.  Oil prices are a political statement made my America's enemies!

2.  Homosexual rights.  I am flat out sick of having this krap shoved down my throat.  I was taught to believe homosexuality is a perversion.  It is a deviation of the norm in the human standard. Those people are not a part of a minority, they are deviations from the norm.  Scientifically speaking you will find that homosexuals have a malfunction of the brain.  Something to do with an imbalance of key enzymes.  The Bible states that homosexuality is an abomination in the eyes of the Lord.  FACTS!  I refuse to accept this as normal because some bleeding heart homosexual politicians want to be accepted as they are.  Homosexuals are not only perverts, they are pure hedonists.  All they do is seek out personal delight at the expense of society.  Rarely does a homosexual do something on a purely altruistic basis.   So I am telling you I WILL NOT accept homosexuals as normal members of society.  WILL NOT!!

3.  There are serious problems with the military.  First off, our troops over-seas, are not there to promote Democracy.  They are promoting imperialism!  America's  troops are assisting foreign governments that are unpopular with the people that live in the area.  The fact is, the borders of countries in the Middle East DO NOT accurately define the cultures of people that actually live there.  That is a FACT!  Secondly, the military of the United State of America is being filled with skinheads, militant minorities, and homosexuals.  This has gotten so bad, that REAL military individuals, those who truly love their country and the military, are not re-upping nor are quality individuals signing up.  I know of individuals in the Army that are not re-upping because they are disgusted with the direction the military is taking.  So Americans, thanks to inept and unethical politicians, the military will be filled with groups of people that hate each other, and are in the military to learn how to destroy things to promote their cause.  FACT!

4.  The Federal system in this country is bloated and has gotten to a non-productive stage.  George Washington and crew set the USA up as a group of semi-autonomous states bound together by a Federal constitution.  The Federal government's job is to provide a national postal system, a national military to protect the federation, and of course to provide a working currency that may be used in all states.  Well, over the years politicians have bastardized this beautiful and simple plan.  The Department of Energy must be eliminated.  It was started to keep the USA energy independent, and has failed miserably.  The DOE now is just an organization to keep politicians friends and relatives employed.  The same goes for the Department of Education.  Education is a state issue, not a federal one.  The federal government has no business telling any state how to run it's schools.  So this bloated, federal agency must be eliminated.

4.  I feel I am being taxed without representation. I feel I am being taxed by the federal government in the USA and my needs and opinions are being ignored.  On top of that, the tax codes are ridiculously complicated.  I personally believe they are made to be complicated on purpose in order to discourage the average citizen to do their own taxes.  A way to remove the average citizen from their own government.   The federal income tax is WAY out of line.  A solution would be a flat tax of no more than 15%.  I am sick and tired of bearing the burden of politician's economic follies.

    As a form of protest, this is the last year I am paying federal income tax.  Until I see politicians begin to represent me and my needs, and people like me, I will not pay income tax.  I have studied this and find the Constitution of the United States of America guarantees me certain rights that people on the federal level are attempting to remove.  I will be dammed if I will pay these politicians to remove my constitutional rights.  I also intend to publish a web site promoting this cause.  If you all think one person cannot promote changes, then you have not studied history very well.

 You need to understand this is a form of protest, and it grieves me to have to do this. I love my country and I love my state.  I have no quandary paying income taxes, as long as they are used for America and her people, but this is not the case.   I cannot set idly by as elected officials continue to destroy the USA from inside.  I refuse to finance this!  I refuse to be a part of this!

   I demand that you send this message to the president, and all of your associates!  That is your job!

 
Mark Kirk's Reply
Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
senator@kirk.senate.gov
The recipient's mailbox is full and can't accept messages now. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please try resending this message later, or contact the recipient directly.
Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007
Aaron Shock's Reply
Received

4/23/2011

 

Dear Mr. Tertocha,

Thank you for contacting me with your thoughts in regard to the direction of our country and issues that Congress needs to address. I appreciate the benefit of your views and welcome the opportunity to respond.

l believe that the most serious problem facing our country is the financial crisis. Projections for the national debt are at $ 15 trillion in 201 1, or 98% of GDP. Additionally, between 1999 and 2008 the annual average increase in domestic non-defense and non-discretionary spending (things such as education, food stamps, and excluding Medicaid/Medicare/social Security) was 6.4%. However, in 2009, this rose by 11.2%, and in 2010, it has grown by an additional 14.7%.

This type of spending is simply unsustainable, especially when compared to a 4.2% reduction in household income since 2008.

Our financial problems are far beyond what our country has ever faced. To put this in perspective, the average budget deficit (or shortfall) under President Bush was approximately $200 billion, with the largest deficit equaling $468 billion. By contrast, under President Obama deficits for his first two years in office have been at $1.5 trillion each year. In addition, the President's proposed 2012 budget, by his own projection, is scored with a deficit of $ 1.6 trillion.

Even with overspending by previous Congresses and the Bush Administration, our nation could have grown out of our debt in a generation, but no more. As a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, l know that we must do better and write a budget that does not add more crushing debt to our already overburdened fiscal situation.

The House passed H.R. 1, the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, also known as the Continuing Resolution, in February. This legislation would fund the Federal Government for the remaining months of the fiscal year, and cuts $100 billion from discretionary spending.

Everything was on the table for cuts, both Republican and Democrat priorities, and virtually no program, including defense spending, was spared.

Unfortunately, some of my Senate colleagues have chosen to offer criticism rather than a viable alternative to the House's spending bill. As the budget debate continues, 1 look forward to suggestions from my colleagues in the Senate as well as the House. 1 do not believe that it is enough to highlight the spending problem, only to turn around and ask that those cuts not affect Illinois. The hard truth is that everyone must do their part. It should also be noted that the same Senators and Representatives who are criticizing these cuts are responsible for failing to pass a full-year budget last year for the first time since 1974.

The current levels of government spending also have far-reaching consequences for the economy and job creation. While it may seem that these two issues are completely unrelated, the truth is that they are very much connected. The President's own economic advisors have estimated that debt loads above 90 percent of GDP result in a reduction in economic growth of one percentage point. Conversely, a one percent increase in GDP could create 979,000 jobs. Put more simply, our current debt level is creating a drag on our economy that could be removed just by reducing our level of spending. Far from destroying jobs, cutting government spending will create thousands of new jobs. The best way to help struggling Americans is to help create an economy that is growing and that will provide them with job opportunities so they can support themselves and their families. Ultimately, that is what a vote to cut spending is about.

I have come to accept that we can no longer afford certain spending items 1 would have supported only a few years ago. Some items simply are not at the top priority level and thus can no longer be funded. Other worthy programs must be trimmed back significantly if we are going I to return to fiscal sanity and restore economic growth with robust job creation in the private sector. Every program we can do without-.-, or that can be done in the private sector-.- must l have its federal funding eliminated.

I ! I While it is important to make significant cuts to government discretionary spending, that is only |1 a down-payment on reducing the deficit. In 2010, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, ' k' datary spending'' because the government is obligated to pay these benefits, make known as man up 60% of federal spending, vastly more than any other spending segment. By 2016, spending on those three programs alone will equal the amount of federal spending on all programs in 2010 and amount to 72% of spending. By 2045, the amount the federal government is obligated to pay in mandatory spending will equal the entire revenue of the federal budget. In other words, the federal government will literally have no funds left over to fund anything else, including education, defense, and transportation. We need entitlement reform if we are going to get a handle on the financial crisis facing our country.

What is more, if we keep borrowing to cover huge annual deficits, the interest on our accumulated national debt will equal every dollar of annual revenue with no money left for Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid payments, let alone discretionary spending-even for national defense.

l believe the American people have been lied to in the past about the dire financial condition our country faces. Catastrophic crises are looming if we fail to take dramatic action to get back on track to living within our means and growing our economy. 1 will not be part of deceiving the people 1 serve by voting for funding that is popular with various segments of people, even if we cannot afford it. It is long past time our government representatives stand up and do the right thing, even though the opposite is the politically popular position. We cannot continue on an unsustainable financial path until we hit a brick wall or fall off a steep cliff as a few American cities and foreign nations have done.

In addition to cutting federal spending through the budget, 1 have also introduced H.R. 606, the Federal Sunset Commission. H.R. 606 is a hi-partisan bill that calls for the creation of a Commission that would review all federal programs and abolish those for which no public need exists. Streamlining federal programs by eliminating those that are unnecessary or redundant will save taxpayer money, as well as make remaining federal programs more efficient. H.R. 606 has been referred to the House Commit-tee on Oversight and Government Reform, and it is my hope that it will be brought to the House floor for a vote in the near future.

l have also no-sponsored H.R. 10, the Regulations from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act. This legislation requires all major regulations from executive agencies to be submitted to Congress for approval before becoming law. The REINS Act will increase transparency in the regulation process, and keep burdensome and unnecessary regulations from being enacted with no input from the American people. 1 believe that executive agencies should be held accountable for how they spend the taxpayers' money, just as Congress is, and this legislation will do just that.

Ultimately', we are at a crossroads. lf we do not make difficult decisions now and get government spending under control, the problem will only grow, and eventually we will reach a crisis point. l recognize that there are no easy solutions for the challenges facing our country, but 1 am willing to make difficult decisions to save future generations from a crushing burden of debt. We have the advantage right now to look into the future; we know the consequences if we do nothing. We must ad now to avoid the fate of those who failed before us.

Again, thank you for contacting me. Please don't hesitate to contact me in the future with regard to this or any other issue. Also, to stay informed on what's happening in Washington, feel free to sign up for my online newsletter, The Schock Report, at www.schoek.house.gov.

Respectfully,

Aaron Schock

Member of Congress

AJS/KR

 

 

 
Richard Durbin's Reply
Received

4/14/2011

 

Dear Mr. Tertocha:

Thank you for contacting me about increasing domestic energy production. I appreciate hearing from you.

I share your interest in addressing our nation's energy needs and support safe and environmentally responsible oil production. I also recognize that an energy policy based primarily on drilling will not meet the needs of American consumers.

The recent rise in fuel prices and increased energy demands have sparked an increased interest in opening additional, more challenging, areas in the outer continental shelf (OCS) and Arctic Wildlife National Refuge (ANWR) to oil and gas leasing. The Deepwater Horizon oil spill has shown us the dangers of deepwater drilling and the prospect of drilling in ANWR poses threats to critical habitats and a number of species. American dependence on foreign oil companies on the other hand, puts us at the mercy of dictators in politically tumultuous regions. The risks of our nation's dependence on fossil fuels are very real.

More areas of our onshore and offshore oil and gas reserves have been made available for leasing and development than ever before - last year, America produced more oil than we had in the last seven years. Despite this, gas prices are nearing a two-year high and continue to rise. While the oil industry has reaped billions of dollars in profits - even after losses stemming from the Deepwater Horizon spill in April 2010 - consumers face a challenging economy.

To gain real energy independence and break our addiction to foreign oil, we need to continue to invest in energy innovation and research. President Obama's budget proposal for Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 includes provisions that are designed to guarantee that the public receives a fair return on the development of our natural resources on public lands and reins in the big oil companies, while ensuring that our approach includes safe and environmentally responsible oil and natural gas production. While the Interior Department considers the 2012-2017 OCS leasing plan for areas in Alaska, the Atlantic, and portions of the Gulf of Mexico, I have called on the President to access our strategic petroleum reserve to at least temporarily stabilize current gasoline prices.

Additionally, the President's recent "Blueprint for a Secure Energy Future" outlines significant steps we can take to increase responsible domestic oil and gas development in the short term, while also harnessing new technologies for sustainable energy development. These efforts include reducing oil demand and making our means of transportation more efficient, manufacturing clean and renewable energy technologies such as wind and biomass, and, in accordance with need and changes in technology over time, reforming appropriate safety and environmental standards.

The spending bill proposed in the House of Representatives (H.R. 1) would take the opposite approach, cutting $750 million from the Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. This represents a 35 percent cut from last year's funding level. In addition, H.R. 1 freezes funding for important research projects that are making new technologies commercially feasible. Innovative energy research projects, including those at Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois, would be stalled or permanently cancelled as a result of these drastic funding cuts. I am eager to explore ways to rein in our growing national debt. Such decisions, however, must be reasoned and carefully considered.

I will keep your thoughts in mind as we work toward federal policies that encourage energy efficiency and the development of clean, cost-efficient, domestic energy sources.

Thank you again for contacting me. Please feel free to keep in touch.

Sincerely,

Richard J. Durbin

United States Senator

RJD/ei

 

                                

Letter to:  Mark Kirk, Aaron Shock, Richard Durbin sent:

5/17/2011

OBAMA wants us to cut the amount of gasoline we use.

The best way to stop using so much gasoline is to deport 15 million illegal immigrants!

That would be 15 million less people using our gas.
The price of gas would come down.

Bring our troops home from Afghanistan to guard the borders.

When they catch an illegal immigrant crossing the Border, hand him/her a canteen, rifle and some ammo and ship him/her to Afghanistan .

Tell him/her if they wants to come to AMERICA then he must serve a tour in OUR military.

Give him/her a soldier's pay while he's there and tax him on it.

After his tour, they will be allowed to become a citizen since their defended this country.

They will also be registered to be taxed and be a legal resident.
This option will probably deter illegal immigration and provide a solution for the troops in Afghanistan and the aliens trying to make a better life for themselves.

If they refuse to serve, ship them to Afghanistan anyway, without the canteen, rifle or ammo.

Problem solved!!

Aaron Shock Answer 

Received 5/23/2011

Dear Mr. Tertocha,

Thank-you for contacting me with regard to immigration. I appreciate having the benefit of your views and the opportunity to respond.

Our country is truly a nation of immigrants Whether it was the pilgrims coming to the new world for religious freedom, or Europeans crossing the Atlantic and arriving at Ellis Island to start a new life- immigrants have always been the foundation of America. Virtually every family living in our country originally came from somewhere else. People might consider their heritage as Italian, Polish, African, or Irish, but they are all equally American.

However, today our country faces a great challenge with regard to immigration. There are some foreigners that choose not to follow the legal pathway and procedures set forth to enter our country. While their intentions might be noble: to work hard and earn a decent living for their family, there is no excuse for their illegal entry into the United States. That is why our border security needs to be strengthened. This is necessary not only for immigration purposes, but also for national security reasons.

Our nation needs to know-and has every right to know-who is coming into our country. Just as locking the door to your home when you leave does not make you a bad neighbor, regulating our border does not make the USA a bad neighbor. After all, the government of Mexico does not have an open border with their southern neighbor, Guatemala.

In addition, the current system for processing potential immigrants into our country needs to be strengthened and streamlined. The more effective our U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Citizenship and Immigration Services are, the more likely foreigners will immigrate to our country in a legal manner.

In the 2010 DHS Appropriations Bill, H.R. 2892, money was allocated to border security. While the bill was not perfect, I strongly supported it because of what it did to enhance border security.

More than $ 10 billion went to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This included $800 million for border fencing, infrastructure, and technology. Additionally, over $500 million was directed for air and marine border protection.

The DHS Appropriations Bill also provided more than $5 billion for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Ninety million dollars was directed for ICE technology and modernization.

Furthermore $1.5 billion was allocated specifically for efforts to identify and deport illegal immigrants with criminal records. Funding in the bill also provides for investigations, legal proceedings, intelligence, visa security programs, and detention, custody and removal operations.

Ninety-one amendments were offered to the DHS Appropriations Bill. However, the Democratic Majority, led by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, only allowed for an actual vote on 14 of them.

Nevertheless, I voted in favor of an amendment offered by Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA) to add $34 million to U.S. Customs and Border Protections to fund 200 additional Border Patrol agents. I also voted for an amendment offered by Rep. Steve King (R-IA) that prohibits funds in the bill being used to employ illegal workers, as defined in the Immigration and Nationality Ad.

Thankfully, both of these amendments passed, and were included in the final version of the bill.

I also want to be clear that the Department of Homeland Security and its efforts to protect our border are not without their own issues of waste and duplication, and I support eliminating duplicating or ineffective measures if they will help cut our spending and reduce our debt. A recent example of such wasteful spending is the virtual fence'' project. The virtual fence'' was begun under a contract signed in 2005, and was supposed to make the U.S.-Mexican border more secure using an advanced network of cameras, radar, and unmanned drones. The fence was projected to cost $7 billion to cover the entire 2,000 mile border, but after only covering 53 miles, the Department of Homeland Security had already spent $1 billion. For that reason, I support the decision by DHS to cancel the project and focus on more efficient use of existing enforcement measures.

You may also be interested to know that in July of 2010, I supported H.R. 5875, the Emergency Border Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010. This legislation would have provided additional emergency funding to DHS and Customs and Border Protection to be used for additional border patrol, including $208 million to hire additional border patrol agents to be deployed on the Southwest border and $14 million for security fencing, infrastructure and technology.

As you know, these are very troubling times for our economy. Unemployment is at the highest rate in decades. It is not acceptable for folks who are in our country illegally to take jobs away from American citizens. That is why I support E-verify, a DHS system that allows employers to electronically verify the legal status of employees. Under the program, participating employers submit information about their new employees to DHS. This information is automatically compared with Social Security Administration information, and DHS databases if necessary, to verify identity and employment eligibility. Currently, over 100,000 employers are registered for the reverify program. More than 3.2 million new hires have already been processed through EVerify, and the system is currently capable of handling up to 25 million inquiries per year.

While I support the E-verify system, I do not support making it mandatory for businesses to use the system. Many small businesses simply cannot afford to pay the set-up, training, and annual fee for use of the current system until improvements are made to drive down its costs. In the meantime I believe the federal government should encourage the use of E-verify.

I am a strong proponent of making English the official language of the United States. We should encourage immigrants to learn English, the common language of our nation, so they can communicate and fully participate in American society. For this reason, I added my name as a no-sponsor of H.R. 997, the National Language Unity Act. This bill requires that all official functions of the federal government be conducted in English. Additionally, the legislation requires that DHS create a uniform English test for candidates for naturalization.

In the 1 112th Congress, I will be first in line to work with the new House leadership and my colleagues in a hi-partisan manner to address the challenges ahead. Make no mistake: I'm committed to immigration reform. The current status-quo of ignoring the problem might seem politically expedient for some Members of Congress, but in the long term it is simply unacceptable to the American people.

Again, thank you for contacting me. As the debate in Washington about immigration continues, I will be certain to keep your views in mind. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future regarding this, or any other issue. Also, to stay informed on what is happening in Washington please feel free to sign up for my electronic newsletter, The Schock Report, at www.schock.house.gov.

Respectfully,

                                                                                                                        

Aaron Schock

Member of Congress

AJS/KR

 

 

Mark Kirk Answer

Received 7/9/2011

Dear Mr. Tertocha:

Thank you for contacting me regarding the price of gasoline. I appreciate hearing your thoughts on this important issue.

Our dependence on foreign oil is a threat to our national security and our economy. Our country produces Only 5.4 million barrels Of oil daily and must import another 1 1.7 million barrels to meet our needs. We need an energy independence policy based on all of the above'' sources, including domestic drilling, natural gas, nuclear, wind, solar, hydro, clean coal, fuel cells, advanced batteries   and conservation.

A long-term energy strategy to provide stability in the market place and reduce our oil consumption should include responsible domestic oil and gas exploration. We should accelerate permitting in the Gulf of Mexico to boost domestic production and spur new job growth. Congress should also explore more opportunities for natural gas production within our own borders. The United States has more than 272 billion cubic feet of dry natural gas reserves both inland and offshore, but consumes less than 22 million cubic feet per year. This untapped resource may also be a viable solution to help end our dependency on imported petroleum.

With the summer months upon us and gas prices spiking at the pump, a discussion has been raised bout using up the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). In the wake of the 1973-74 oil embargo, a the United States established the SPR to protect the country from upsets in petroleum supplies, and to guard itself against national security threats. Strategically located along the Gulf Coast to ensure quick distribution from refineries, the SPR holds approximately 727 million barrels of emergency crude oil and is the largest stockpile of its kind. Delving into our nation' s strategic fuel reserves to prevent small price fluctuations is a poor, short-term solution to a greater, more systemic problem.

The SPR should be held in reserve to ensure our military has what it needs in an emergency, no matter what. Strategic oil reserves should only be used in times of national emergencies, not for price control.

Congress should wipe out the complicated rules that have divided the nation' s gasoline market into 15 separate monopolies, called boutique fuels.'' Currently, there are 15 types of uniquely blended fuel sold in different areas across the country. These special blends known as boutique fuels'' are not interchangeable with other fuel blends. For instance, while we can buy regular gasoline in Central Illinois, only reformulated gasoline (RFG) blended with ethanol is available in Chicagoland. This gasoline is unique to this area and may not be sold elsewhere under federal regulation. If the fuel supply of a unique blend is disrupted or a pipeline fails, law prohibits our local refineries from using a different blend to make up for supply loss.

On March 8, 2011   Senator Roy Blunt (R-MO) introduced the Gas Accessibility and Stabilization (GAS) Act to address regulation constraints of boutique fuels. I am proud to cosponsor this legislation. The GAS act simplifies gasoline regulations so that local refineries can respond to gas disruptions before prices spike at the pump. The GAS Act is but one of many legislative approaches I will support as a Senator, and have supported throughout my tenure as a representative in the House.

As a Congressman, I worked hard to promote strategies that would increase our energy independence. I authored the Apollo Energy Independence Act, H.R. 6385, which would tap the greatest assets of the United States - Yankee ingenuity and free markets - to boost alternative vehicles and clean American energy sources to reduce our consumption of foreign oil by nearly 85 percent. H.R. 6385 would have provided market incentives to reduce our dependence on oil from the Middle East without raising our taxes. In addition, the Apollo Energy Independence Act would have permanently extended investment tax credits for renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, fuel cell, nuclear energy and hydropower. This bill was a right step and a model for moving our nation on a path to a more comprehensive and inclusive energy strategy.

In December of 2007, Congress chose wisely to increase our nation's Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards. I voted to pass the House-amended version of H.R. 6, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. For the first time in thirty years, this landmark energy legislation increased the CAFE standard for cars and SUVS from 27.5 mites per gallon (MPG) and 22.2 mpg respectively, to 35 MPG by 2020. This provision will save 1.1 million barrels of oil per day and 191 million metric tons of greenhouse gases per year. This bill became Public Law No: 110-140     and I am proud to have voted in favor of this legislation.

These initiatives are components of overdue energy reforms our country needs to lessen its dependency on foreign oil, bolster our national security and promote job growth. With a comprehensive approach we can assert our energy independence and lessen the burden on taxpayers at the pump.

Again, thank you for taking the time to contact me. To stay informed on important issues, I encourage you to visit my website at http://kirk.senate.gov and my Facebook page at http://www.facebook.co|senatorKkk.

Very Truly Yours,

Mark Kirk

United States Senator

                              Please note:  Posting of Mark Kirks letter was delayed due to a computer failure that I use to maintain this website.

                ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ NOTE! Richard Durbin chose not to reply to this letter!

Apparently he supports Taxation without representation.  Send him your tax dollars but forget about sending him your opinions.  Unless they match party dogma, he is not interested in what you think!